Categories
Leadership Leadership Teams Team Effectiveness

Improving Team Building Efforts

Team building is a process of improving the ability of a team to collaborate and help it both achieve organizational results and fulfill the needs of its participants. Because some groups demonstrate unconscious patterns that limit their effectiveness, these engagements usually involve diagnosis, facilitation, and coaching over many weeks and months.

Unfortunately, the investments some organizations make in team building do not translate to improved results. Before hiring a consultant to help you conduct a team building effort to enhance collaboration, consider the following five questions.

How are you defining collaboration?

Your definition of collaboration may or may not correspond with how your team defines it. 

Collaboration is more than team members demonstrating positive teaming behaviors in meetings or team members acting upon top-down decisions. Instead, it implies that members willfully engage each other, share their best thinking with each other, consciously debate ideas, and remain open to feedback from their colleagues – both within and outside of team meetings.

Before I accept team building engagements, I often suggest that CEOs first elicit input from their leadership teams about what it means to collaborate. This practice can help surface any inconsistencies among team members and ensure that a team building initiative will succeed because there is alignment around what collaboration means. 

Is your executive group really a team?

A workgroup is not necessarily a team. Workgroups are traditionally top-down oriented with team members focused on tasks with little or no need for collaboration. However, to be a team implies there are dependencies between individuals on the team, as well as a shared vision. It also suggests that the nature of the work to be done is complex enough to call forth a need for different perspectives. It is not a good investment of organizational resources to conduct a team building effort when a workgroup is not a team. 

Are members of your executive team capable of collaborating?

Some leaders are seemingly not wired to collaborate in a team environment. In fact, some leaders should remain individual contributors and not be expected to collaborate based on their working style and personality. Before conducting a team building session, its critical to assess the capacity of team members to function as a team. For those team members who actively resist such efforts, they may need additional one-on-one coaching and feedback to help them remain open to the idea. 

One healthcare CEO I worked with had a CMO on his senior leadership team who actively resisted efforts to build a collaborative team. The engagement was still positive, but several months later the CMO resigned. The new CMO was strongly supportive of team effectiveness, and the senior leadership team flourished in its efforts to collaborate. 

Are there structures in place that support collaboration?

The lack of structural support for a team and collaboration can diminish any effort to help a workgroup become a team. For example, if executives are compensated solely for their individual effort, there is little motivation to function as a collaborative team. Another example of a critical organizational structure is performance standards. Organizations that embed expectations of success for both business goals and demonstration of core competencies (e.g., collaboration, communication, etc.) provide a compelling incentive for members of the senior leadership team to collaborate.

In the vignette noted in the last question, the CEO did raise the issue of the CMOs resistance to him directly. However, there were no implications regarding negative impacts on his performance appraisal. As a result, the resistant behavior continued. 

How does your behavior impact collaboration?

I rarely take on a team building client if I don’t believe an executive can reflect on how their behavior may contribute to the lack of collaboration on a team. This behavior can be explicit, such as verbally criticizing the ideas of team members in an open forum, as well as non-verbally such as when an executive rolls her eyes when team members share their proposals.

I recall working with an executive team where the CEO was frustrated because team members remained passive and would not step up and address important issues. Upon further exploration, it became evident that he was unable to let go of control of the team – thus, reinforcing a pattern of passivity among these direct reports. I raised the issue with him directly, and after some exploration, he became more receptive to letting the team take greater ownership of their process. As the team increased its trust, this CEO even became willing to allow the senior leadership team to meet without him.

Many sectors, especially healthcare, are facing higher pressure to delivering quality services at lower costs. Therefore, collaboration within the organization, especially at the senior-most levels, is critical. A team building initiative can make a substantial contribution to accelerating this process to become more collaborative. CEOs should ask themselves some critical questions before launching such an effort to ensure its success.

# # # # #

Dr. Kevin Nourse has more than 25 years of experience developing transformational change leaders in healthcare and other sectors. He is the founder of Nourse Leadership Strategies, a coaching and leadership development firm based in Southern California. For more information, contact Kevin at 310.715.8315 or kevin@nourseleadership.com

(c) 2020 Kevin Nourse

Categories
Healthcare Leadership Leadership Teams Resiliency

Reigniting Leadership Resilience

Steve is a CEO in a 300-bed healthcare system and has four senior executives that report directly to him. With the stresses and demands of the COVID pandemic, he has noticed a palpable decline in their leadership resilience. They are much more emotionally reactive, make poor decisions, and become easily rattled in dealing with emerging issues. Worse yet, their inability to sustain a calm demeanor in the face the second COVID surge seems to be triggering panic among their direct reports. 

The functioning of the senior leadership team in any organization plays a critical role in shaping culture and influencing organizational success. The ability of the executive team to resiliently navigate tough challenges can shape the collective resilience of an organization. What can you do to build leadership resilience in the face of setback and adversity so common during COVID?

Be Aware of the Symptoms of Burnout

Pay attention to the behavior and language used among your leadership team, taking note of self-defeating language and fight-flight-freeze behavior that can spread like a wildfire from one executive to another. Other symptoms of burnout among your team members could include: 

  • Frequent absenteeism 
  • Mistakes 
  • Reduced motivation or increased resistance in taking on new projects 
  • Emotional outbursts 
  • Frequent silence in leadership team meetings 
  • Lack of collaboration 
  • Unproductive conflict 

Identify and Explore the Causes of Burnout

It’s difficult to address the issue of burnout if you are not aware of what’s causing it. There are a number of potential causes: 

  • Inadequate resources to achieve organizational priorities 
  • Role overload of team members 
  • Role ambiguity and confusion 
  • Fire-fighting mentality 
  • Lack of focus on anticipating future challenges 
  • Little or no recognition for team achievements 
  • Inefficient processes 
  • Lack of alignment among the senior leadership team on key priorities 

Be aware that as the team leader, you may be one of the contributing factors to the burnout of your team. In one client organization I worked with, the team leader was so afraid of conflict that he did not advocate for his team when it came to requesting financial resources and managing boundaries with other teams. This resulted in team members feeling overwhelmed and frustrated at the lack of support from above.

Adopt an Appreciative View of Successes and Progress

Most teams look ahead to the next challenge and often forget to celebrate progress as a way to build leadership resilience. This is particularly relevant during the COVID pandemic given the uncertainty of how long it will last.  Many of the leadership teams I have consulted with often claim they don’t need acknowledgment of their successes and yet, recognition is such an integral ingredient to sustaining ones’ resiliency. Make an effort, as a team, to identify progress. Instead of asking the question “where did we fail?” consider asking questions like “where did we succeed?” or “what did we learn?” One senior leadership team I worked with recently committed to quarterly sessions to reevaluate progress toward priorities and acknowledge challenges they overcame together. 

Recommit to Your Collective Values, Mission, and Vision

One surefire way to reignite leadership resilience is to revisit your core values, your mission as a team, and the vision you are trying to unfold. This kind of activity allows a team to revisit with its larger purpose by disengaging from the tactical details and day-to-day frustrations and explore essential questions. Good questions to explore as a group include: 

  • How are we living our core values in our work? 
  • How have we made manifest our vision? 
  • What is the impact of our mission on our community and world? 

Senior leadership teams play a critical role in shaping the culture of an organization. When leadership teams periodically reinvest in their resilience individually and collectively, they are better able to sustain their performance and convey a sense of optimism to their followers – particularly critical during the COVID pandemic. 

# # # # #

Dr. Kevin Nourse has more than 25 years of experience developing transformational change leaders in healthcare and other sectors. He is the founder of Nourse Leadership Strategies, a coaching and leadership development firm based in Southern California. For more information, contact Kevin at 310.715.8315 or kevin@nourseleadership.com

(c) 2020 Kevin Nourse

Categories
Goal Setting Leadership Success

Achieving Goals: The role of self-efficacy and action orientation

It’s that time of year when so many of us endeavor to set goals and resolutions for the New Year. Despite best intentions, many people never actually achieve their goals. While there are many factors that enable goal achievement, two of the most important ones are self-efficacy and an action orientation.

Self-efficacy, a concept identified by psychologist Albert Bandura in the late 1970s, are the beliefs you hold about your ability to achieve a goal or manage a challenging situation. People with high self-efficacy are more likely to set higher goals, procrastinate less, and demonstrate greater tenacity in working toward their goals. 

Psychologist Joachim Brunstein identified action orientation nearly 20 years ago consisting of a trait enabling decisive and rapid action to achieve a goal. People who posses this trait have the ability to regulate the emotions that might keep themselves stuck overanalyzing an issue or planning how to achieve a goal.  

Consider the following options to build your self-efficacy:

  1. Reflect on past challenges you faced or goals you achieved to identify the skills, mindsets or abilities you tapped to create success.
  2. Recite positive affirmations aloud when facing a goal or setback to shift your mindsets and self-beliefs (e.g., “I have all the skills I need to conquer this challenge successfully”).
  3. Ask three people who know you well to describe your biggest strengths and the impact of using those strengths. 
  4. Surround yourself with highly accomplished people who have a strong belief in their capabilities.
  5. Read biographies about people who have achieved great things to understand their process and approach better.  

Here’s some tips on building your action orientation capabilities:

  1. Set concrete time limits for your planning and goal setting.
  2. Engage friends and colleagues to hold you accountable for taking action, such as designing a consequence if you do not take action (e.g., write them a check for a substantial dollar amount they will cash if you do not take action by the agreed upon date). 
  3. Experiment taking action without any planning; learn to trust your instincts.
  4. Chunk your big goals into microgoals – small actions you can take with minimal effort and resistance.
  5. Identify the conditions that cause you to get stuck in analysis paralysis (e.g., exhaustion, overwhelm, frustration, etc.).

People who achieve a lot in life and work do so because they set stretch goals, take action and celebrate their achievements. Self-efficacy and an action orientation are integral to effective goal setting. The good news is that everyone can enhance these skills and achieve greater levels of success.

# # # # #

Dr. Kevin Nourse has more than 25 years of experience developing transformational change leaders in healthcare and other sectors. He is the founder of Nourse Leadership Strategies, a coaching and leadership development firm based in Southern California. For more information, contact Kevin at 310.715.8315 or kevin@nourseleadership.com

(c) 2021 Kevin Nourse

Categories
Leadership Resiliency

Building Organizational Resilience Through Leadership

We consider resilience a skill or quality people can develop to navigate challenging times. However, organizational leaders can play a significant role in the ability of their direct reports to build and sustain their resilience in the face of adversity. 

A recent study in Group and Organization Management found that transformational leaders contribute to the capacity of their followers to increase their resilience by evoking positive emotions. The researchers polled people in several Canadian healthcare organizations facing a significant crisis, and participants were members of clinical teams and their managers. The positive emotions experienced by the employees contributed to greater levels of creativity in solving challenging problems in the crisis, resulting in enhanced self-confidence. Among the behaviors transformational leaders use that trigger these positive emotions are a positive vision of the future, confidence in subordinates’ abilities to tackle the challenges created by the crisis, and reinforcing core values. 

The findings of this study are consistent with a resilience-building program I implemented for a healthcare client. The client was experiencing significant change at the senior leader level, which resulted in frustration, disillusionment, and disengagement among middle managers and staff. The leadership development project consisted of three parts:

  1. An electronic survey of staff attitudes about the challenges they faced and factors that helped or diminished their ability to remain resilient.
  2. A training session for the managers in the department on resiliency and exploration of the survey themes.
  3. A training session for staff in the department on resiliency-building strategies and concepts.

The factors staff identified as detrimental to their resilience were needing more clarity and direction, inefficiencies in core work processes, and overwhelming workload. The primary theme associated with sustaining the resiliency of staff was the support provided by managers and role modeling (managers modeled resilience for their direct reports).

Both the study and my client intervention align with the theme of leaders playing a critical role in shaping the resilience of their staff from two perspectives: 

  • Increasing the experience of positive emotions through transformational leader behaviors, including supporting their teams and modeling resilient behavior. 
  • Decreasing the experience of negative emotions by identifying and eliminating their sources, such as removing confusion about goals, improving the efficiency of core work processes, and recalibrating the workload of staff. 

While a leader’s role in sustaining their followers’ resilience is becoming more apparent, researchers need to explore various factors, such as the impact of gender, peer relationships, and the nature of the challenge or adversity that people are experiencing.

# # # # #

Dr. Kevin Nourse has more than 25 years of experience developing transformational change leaders in healthcare and other sectors. He is the founder of Nourse Leadership Strategies, a coaching and leadership development firm based in Southern California. For more information, contact Kevin at 310.715.8315 or kevin@nourseleadership.com

(c) 2020 Kevin Nourse

Categories
Leadership Teams

Leadership Retreats in the Era of COVID

Leadership retreats have traditionally provided valuable opportunities to build relationships and trust, share insights, advance organizational change priorities, and reinforce corporate culture. When conducted at the end of a fiscal or calendar year, they provide an excellent opportunity to reflect on achievements and lessons learned and set clear intentions for a new year. With the magnitude of changes many leaders currently face in the new normal triggered by COVID, there has never been a more critical time to bring leaders together to align on a vision for the future and share insights from the past six months.

These realities beg the question: How can organizations conduct leadership retreats that create value using a virtual platform?  

In this blog post, I share my observations on five key challenges organizations face in conducting virtual retreats and mitigation strategies to ensure success.

Challenge #1: Death by passivity

Whether conducted in-person or via Zoom, many leadership retreats fail because participants are overwhelmed by the amount of content introduced without any interactivity. In many instances, organizers fear drives them to pack retreat agendas with too much material. When they begin to run out of time, presenters begin to speak even faster and eliminate opportunities to interact with the audience. To address this:

  • Review the presentations proposed by each speaker to make sure they have built interactivity into their talks; aim for every 6-8 minutes using such features as a chat, poll, whiteboard, or breakout groups. 
  • Be ruthlessly honest when reviewing the program design in terms of realistic time allocations of each segment.
  • Provide opportunities for regular breaks after 90-minute parts of the content and informal breaks as needed, such as inviting everyone to stand up and stretch. 
  • Avoid using a monotone voice that can lull people to sleep; consider standing when you facilitate or present and use your hands naturally to inject more energy and vocal variety.
  • For a multi-day retreat, poll participants at the end of the first day to determine if there is enough interactivity.
  • Invite participants to turn off their video cameras – not only does this reduce the bandwidth needed for the session, but it also reduces the exhaustion participants might experience.

Challenge #2: Frustrations of Zoom-newbies

Many new Zoom users get frustrated when a leadership retreat begins, and they are unsure how to use the software features. This frustration can spill over and lead them to disengage from the retreat content. Consider:

  • Orienting new Zoom users on how to use software features before the start of the retreat
  • Explaining to participants how to maximize their participation such as using a workstation (versus a PDA or cell phone), printing the materials in advance, and joining the session in a location that is quiet and has a powerful WIFI signal.
  • Inviting participants to sign-on 15-20 minutes early to work through any technical issues, especially audio.
  • Polling your group in advance to find out who has experience or skill in using Zoom.

Challenge #3: Technical snafus, poor sound, and lighting 

Producing a polished, well-facilitated virtual retreat with sufficient lighting and audio can significantly impact whether you achieve your envisioned outcomes. Early in the pandemic this spring, Zoom session participants were much more forgiving of technical snafus since many were still learning how to use it. However, as Zoom has become more commonplace, expectations of a well-produced session have become higher. To prevent technical snafus:

  • If you are the facilitator starting the Zoom session, consider hardwiring your system to a network instead of using a WIFI.
  • Each session should have a producer running the meeting and managing the technology, enabling a subject-matter expert to focus on content delivery.
  • Be sure to do dry runs if you’ve never used specific Zoom features, such as breakout groups or whiteboards.
  • Ensure you have adequate security, including passcodes.
  • Test both the audio and lighting for presenters to ensure higher quality communication. 

Challenge #4: Lack of relevance, organization, and flow

With in-person retreats, it is much easier to spontaneously adapt the program in the moment. On the other hand, successful online retreats typically need much more preparation. The lack of significance for participants can result in disengagement, frustration, and wasted resources. To build relevance:

  • Conduct focus groups to gather input from selected participants about their challenges, envisioned outcomes for the retreat, and logistical issues or concerns.
  • Poll front-line staff to gather their feedback on issues that limit their ability to perform their roles or perspectives on how well the leadership team collaborates; use this information in the retreat to improve overall organizational functioning.
  • Clarify both the retreat objectives or outcomes and the detailed design for each segment, including the start and end time, the speaker, and interactive activities.
  • Consider using a time-bound approach that addresses and explores past accomplishments, present realities, and plans or goals for the future.
  • Poll the group periodically to assess how well the session are meeting their needs and addressing the stated objectives.  

Challenge #5: Lack of real-time human connection

One of the most significant benefits of an in-person retreat is the ease of access to colleagues for spontaneous relationship building. However, there are strategies you can use to inject human connection in a Zoom retreat, such as:

  • Conduct icebreakers throughout the retreat in breakout groups of 4-5 people to give everyone a chance to engage; provide some powerful open-ended questions to guide the conversations.
  • Poll the group at various intervals to learn more about participants and their backgrounds (e.g., tenure, title, college degrees, etc.)  
  • Invite participants to share a personal artifact near their workstation on video, such as a photograph, paperweight, or diploma.
  • Schedule an informal, unstructured happy hour as the final session and invite participants to breakout groups for networking and relationship building.  
  • Enable participants to customize their Zoom name to reflect their role, location, pet name or other descriptive information (e.g., “Kevin – Palm Springs”).

Virtual leadership retreats that focus on building alignment, clarity, and trust are more critical than ever given the uncertainties many organizations face in the COVID pandemic. Through preparation and purposeful design of the agenda, interactivity, organizations can achieve a substantial return on the investment of time and resources. 

# # # # #

Dr. Kevin Nourse has more than 25 years of experience developing transformational change leaders in healthcare and other sectors. He is the founder of Nourse Leadership Strategies, a coaching and leadership development firm based in Southern California. For more information, contact Kevin at 310.715.8315 or kevin@nourseleadership.com

(c) 2020 Kevin Nourse

Categories
Grit Leadership Development Resiliency

Leading Change in the Age of Acceleration

Categories
Leadership Development

Democratizing Change Leadership

Summarizing research since 2000, researchers Dumas and Beinecke* identified a meta-framework and supporting conclusions about successfully implementing change. Their article explored supporting literature associated with two views of change leadership. One of their critical findings in this review was the shift from focusing only on specific change initiatives and tactics to creating a broader change embracive organizational culture where all employees are equipped with abilities to initiate and navigate change.

This perspective resonates with my experience in building organizational and leadership resilience. Rather than viewing change as a periodic effort, many of the executives I’ve partnered with are interested in creating cultures where people throughout their organization can initiate and lead change even though they may not have a managerial title. In essence, organizational members are provided the requisite skills, access to information, and a level of autonomy to capitalize on change opportunities.

For example, I’ve delivered leadership development programs focused on strategic thinking and change leadership to organizations as a means for helping staff recognize and exploit untapped opportunities to create greater organizational value. Programs such as these help shift the mindset of people from feeling like a victim of their circumstance toward being an author of their experience. In psychological terms, their locus of control shifts from external to internally-driven. Employees that are empowered with this kind of training and support are far less likely to fear change even if it is initiated from above.

Organizations that democratize change leadership skills accrue substantial dividends in terms of greater agility, resilience, and sustainability over time.

*Dumas, C. & Beinecke, R.H. (2017). Change leadership in the 21st century. Journal of Organizational Change, 31(1), 867-876.

# # # # #

Dr. Kevin Nourse has more than 25 years of experience developing resilient change leaders in the association sector. He is the founder of Nourse Leadership Strategies, a coaching and leadership development firm based in Southern California and Washington, DC. For more information, contact Kevin at 310.715.8315 or kevin@nourseleadership.com

(c) 2019 Kevin Nourse

Categories
Leadership Resiliency

Advancing Leadership Success by Building Resilience